EXPECTATION FROM COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH LONG-TERM PRELINGUAL DEAFNESS

  • C. MARTU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • Corina BUTNARU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • F. ANGHELINA University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, ENT Department
  • Tatiana MERIACRE Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, ENT Department, Iasi, Romania
  • B.M. COBZEANU Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, ENT Department, Iasi, Romania
  • D. MARTU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Abstract

Cochlear implantation is a well-established method of treating bilateral profound cochlear deafness. One should be aware that the medical literature is quite poor, in regard to the outcomes of the implantation of adolescents or adults with prelingual deafness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the audio-verbal outcome in late implanted adolescents and adults with congenital deafness. Material and methods: the study included 8 late implanted patients with bilateral profound deafness 4 of them were implanted as adolescents and the other 4 as adults; all of them were implanted at the Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital from Iasi. The patients’ hearing abilities were tested using 2 scales: Speech Perception Rating Scale and Speech Intelligibility Rating Scale. Results: all of the patients have benefited from the implant when their hearing performances were compared to those before implantation. Conclusions: the topic remains open as long as the studies had only a limited number of subjects, but even so it can be affirmed that, with no doubt, all the subjects have had significant improvements after implantation.

Author Biographies

C. MARTU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Surgery (II)
Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, ENT Department, Iasi, Romania

Corina BUTNARU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Surgery (II)
Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, ENT Department, Iasi, Romania

D. MARTU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Surgery (II)

References

1. Eisenberg LS, Kirk KI, Martinez AS, et al. Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing. Comparison with cochlear implant users. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 563-569.
2. Geier L, Barker MJ, Opie J, et al. Speech perception in post lingually deafened adult Clarion users with long-term deafness. In: Waltzman S, Cohen N, editors. Cochlear implants. New York: Theme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2000, 336-337.
3. Oh SH, Kim CS, Kang EJ, et al. Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 148-153.
4. Taitelbaum-Swead R, Kishon-Rabin L, Kaplan-Neeman R, et al. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 69: 1675-1683.
5. El-Hakin H, Abdolell M, Mount RJ, et al. Influence of age at implantation and of residual hearing on speech outcome measures after cochlear implantation: binary partitioning analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 102-108.
6. Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, et al. Effects of age at implantation in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002; 189: 69-73.
7. Tyler R, Kelsay D, Teagle H, et al. 7-Year speech perception results and the effect of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 57: 305-310.
8. Radulescu L, Martu D. Do we need an ethics committee in order to make decisions regarding the cochlear implant? Revista Romana de Bioetica 2007; 5(2): 27-32.
9. Radulescu L, Curocichin G, Buza A, et al. Efficiency of SNPs for the Detection of 35DelG Mutation in 50 Cases with No syndromic Hearing Loss. Revista de Chimie 2018; 69(8): 2273-2277.
10. Kang DH, Lee MJ, Lee KY, Lee SH, Jang JH. Prediction of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients with Prelingual Deafness. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 9(3): 220-225.
11. Georgescu MG, Stan CI, Marinescu AN, et al. Nonorganic hearing loss. Malingering, factitious or conversion disorder? Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine 2014; 22(1): 35-40.
12. Clark GM, Busby PA, Roberts SA, Dowell RC, Tong YC, Blamey PJ, Nienhuys TG, Mecklenburg DJ, Webb RL, Pyman BC, et al. Preliminary results for the cochlear corporation multielectrode intra-cochlear implant in six pre-lingual deaf patients. Am J Otol 1987; 8(3): 234-239.
13. Krahulcova B. Interdisciplinary Approaches, Co-operation and Counselling in Study Guide for Edu-cational Staff Working with Hearing Impaired Children G. Diller, J. Kosmalowa, B. Krahulcova, M. Lehnhardt, F. Peralta, Wroclaw, Poland: Drukarnia “JAKS”, 2005, 475.
14. Markey AL, Nichani J, Lockley M, Melling C, Ramsden RT, Green KM, Bruce IA. Cochlear implan-tation in adolescents: Factors influencing compliance. Cochlear Implants Int 2015; 16(4): 186-194.
15. Knight K, Ducasse S, Coetzee A, van der Linde J, Louw A. The effect of age of cochlear implantation on vocal characteristics in children. S Afr J Commun Disord 2016; 63(1): 142.
16. R. Harrison, K. Gordon, R. Mount, Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Dev Psy-chobiol 2005; 46: 252-261.
17. Maria Izabel Kos, Marielle Deriaz, Jean Philippe Guyot, Marco Pelizzone. What can be expected from a late cochlear implantation? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2009; 73: 189-193.
18. Bayazıt YA, Altınyay Ş, Cevizci R. Delayed prelingual cochlear implantation in childhood and puberty. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79(2): 146-150.
19. Teoh SW, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness. Part I. Clinical results. Laryngoscope 2004; 114(9): 1536-1540.
20. Cavaleriu BD, Martu DV, Hritcu L, Radulescu L. Idiopathic Sudden Hearing Loss: Oxidative Status Before and After Corticoid Treatment. Archives of Biological Sciences 2015; 67(4): 1297-1302.
21. Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Maier W, Beck R, Schild C, Birkenhäger R, Wesarg T, Kröger S, Arndt S. Cochlear implant for malformations of the inner ear. HNO 2009; 57(6): 533-541.
Published
2018-12-27