THE INFORMED CONSENT IN PEDIATRICS – A CHILD’S RIGHT

  • Dana Elena MINDRU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Mioara Calipsoana MATEI “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Aurica RUGINA “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Irina Mihaela CIOMAGA “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • N. NISTOR “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Laura FLORESCU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Abstract

THE INFORMED CONSENT IN PEDIATRICS-A CHILD’S RIGHT (Abstract): Consent signifies the patient’s knowingly authorization of a medical intervention. Revealing the truth about the patient’s condition refers to the provision of information by the physician regarding the diagnosis and the treatment, as well as their understanding by the patient. His or her decision-making capacity refers to the ability of understanding the data that have been provided. The independent decision refers to the patient’s right to make a free decision regarding his or her treatment, without constraint or manipulation. Informed consent is one of the most sensitive issues of the physician-patient, researcher-subject relationship. Minors do not have the capacity of independent decision; therefore, the decision by substitution given by parents or legal representatives is required. The minor child’s consent to the medical treatment and pediatric scientific research expresses itself under the form of assent, which is valid starting with the age of 14. Doctors should ask for parental consent before medical interventions (except in cases of emergency, when parents cannot be contacted). From a practical standpoint, when it comes to obtaining a valid consent, it is useful to make a distinction between the problem-solving process and the decision-making process. The permission given by parents includes all standard elements of informed consent. In each case, the doctor has to make sure that he or she has a valid consent because, in legal terms, treating a patient without his or her consent is a crime, while treatment based on inadequate consent constitutes negligence.

Author Biographies

Dana Elena MINDRU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine

Mioara Calipsoana MATEI, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Preventive Medicine and Interdisciplinarity
Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Center, Iasi

Aurica RUGINA, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine

Irina Mihaela CIOMAGA, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine

N. NISTOR, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine

Laura FLORESCU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine

References

1. Pellegrino ED. The internal morality of clinical medicine: a paradigm for the ethics of the helping and healing professions. J Med Philos 2001; 26: 559-579.
2. ***American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed Consent. Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95(2): 314-317.
3. *** Centrul Multifunctional. 1990. Legea 18/1990 Conventia privind Drepturile Copilului. Available from:http://centrumultifunctional.worldvision.ro/legislatie/legea-18-1990-conventia-privind-drepturile- copilului-a54.
4. Van Staden CW, Kruger C. Incapacity to give informed consent owing to mental disorder. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 41-43.
5. ***Declaraţia Universală a Drepturilor Omului 1948. Available from: http://www.anr.gov.ro/docs/ legislatie/internationala/Declaratia_Universala_a_Drepturilor_Omului.pdf
6. *** International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available from: http: //www.cioms.ch/ publications/guidelines/ guidelines_ nov_2002_blurb.htm
7. Dickenson D. Children’s informed consent to treatment: is the law an ass? J Med Ethics 1994; 20 (4): 205-222.
8. Butnariu A, Lupu I, Buta M. Consimtamantul informat in practica pediatrica si in cercetarea vizand copilul. Rev Rom Bioet 2009; 7(1): 38-46.
9. ***Monitorul Oficial, 2001. Conventia cu privire la drepturile copilului.
Available from:http://legislatie.resurse-pentru-democratie.org/legea/conventia-cu-privire-la-drepturile copilului-1989.php
10. Kluge EH. Informed Consent by Children. The new reality. CMAJ 1995; 152 (9): 1495-1497.
11. Moisa SM, Gramma R, Parvu A, Dumitras S, Enache M, Roman G, et al. Modele de luare a decizilor în pediatrie. Ro J Pediatr 2013; 62(1): 35-42.
12. Eekelaar J. The interests of the child and the child’s wishes. The best interests of the child. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
13. Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, Williams JR, Singer P. Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent. Can Med Assoc J 1996; 155(2): 177-180.
14. Zanc I, Lupu I. Bioetica medicala. Principii, dileme, soluţii. Cluj Napoca: Editura Medicala Universitara “Iuliu Hatieganu”, 2006.
15. Bogdan C. Observaţii privind respectarea dreptului la consimţământul informat la subiecţii competenţi și la cei vulnerabili. Rev Rom Bioet 2008; 6(1): 29-38.
16. ***Monitorul Oficial, 2003. Legea nr. 46/2003, Legea drepturilor pacientului. Available from: http://www.dreptonline.ro/legislatie/legea_drepturilor_pacientului.php
17. Bulgakov M. Însemnările unui tânăr medic. Iasi: Editura Polirom, 2005.
18. ***Codul Nuremberg (1947) și Declaratia Helsinki (1964).
Available from: http://nostrabrucanus.wordpress.com/libertatea-sanatatii/codul-nuremberg-1947/
19. Post SG. Risk and vulnerable groups. In: Encyclopedia of Bioethics. 3rd Edition. Macmillan Publishing House, USA, 2004.
Published
2019-03-29
Section
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE - LABORATORY