CORPUL CA SURSÃ DE SEMNIFICAȚIE. PERSPECTIVE INTERDISCIPLINARE

  • I. Al. TOFAN Universitatea ”Al.I. Cuza” Iași
  • Irina CRUMPEI Universitatea ”Al.I. Cuza” Iași
Keywords: IMAGE, PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT, MORALITY

Abstract

This paper concerns a general theoretical aspect, followed by different examples which
discuses the thesis in relation to major connected domains of research: psychology and philosophy.
The thesis which we are arguing for is that the body represents a source of significance in the
definitions of he self used as theoretical background in moral problems (philosophical aspect) and the
explanations of the way the image of the self is consituted (psychological aspect). The philosophical
conclusion is that the body, in its materiality, cannot be judged by the metaphysical dualism scheme,
which assigns it a secondary role in the hierarchy of categories. From a psychological point of view,
this paper tends to show that the body does not represent an accident of personality or a prison of the
soul as Plato refers to it, but rather an element through which personality is built on and develops
and similarly, the mental and personality structures are those which allow the forming of corporeality
and then the persons reference to it.

Author Biographies

I. Al. TOFAN, Universitatea ”Al.I. Cuza” Iași

Facultatea de Filosofie și Știinte Social-Politice
Catedra de Istoria filosofiei și hermeneuticã

Irina CRUMPEI, Universitatea ”Al.I. Cuza” Iași

Facultatea de Psihologie și Științe ale Educației
Catedra de Psihologie medicalã și psihopedagogie specialã

References

1. Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson’s University Library; 1951.
2. Zammito J. Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology. University of Chicago Press, 2002.
3. Henry M. Întrupare. O filosofie a trupului. Sibiu: Ed. Deisis, 2003.
4. *** Patericul sau Apoftegmele Pãrinþilor din pustiu. Iaºi: Ed. Polirom, 2003.
5. Flood G. The Ascetic Self. Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition. Cambridge: University Press, 2004.
6. Foucault M. Istoria sexualitãþii. Timiºoara: Ed. de Vest, 1995.
7. Foucault M. Surveillir et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard, 1975.
8. Loughlin C. Alien Sex. The Body and Desire în Cinema and Theology. Blackwell, 2004.
9. Eliade M. Sacrul ºi profanul. Bucureºti: Humanitas, 1995.
10. Foucault M. Theatrum philosophicum. Studii, eseuri, interviuri (1963-1984). Cluj: Casa Cãrþii de
ªtiinþã, 2001.
11. Freud S. An Outline of Psycho-Analysis. London: Hogarth Press, 1964.
12. Korzybski A. Collected Writings. Kendig M. Ed., Institute of General Semantics, 1920-1950.
13. Kaitaro T. La Peyronie and the experimental search for the seat of the soul: neuropsychological
methodology in the eighteenth century. Cortex 1996; 32: 557-564.
14. Vogt BA, Devinsky O. Topography and relationships of mind and brain. In: Mayer EA, Saper CB
editors. Progress in Brain Research - The Biological Basis for Mind Body Interaction. Elsevier
Science, 2000, 245-252.
15. Crick F, Koch C. Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex?. Nature 1995; 375: 121-123.
16. Devinsky O. Neurological aspects of the conscious and unconscious mind. Ann NY Acad Sci
1997; 835: 321-329.
17. Kinsbourne M. The brain and body awarness. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T editors. Body Image. A
Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice. New York: The Guilford Press, 2002, 22-29.
18. Ramachandran VS, Blakeslee S. Phantoms in the Brain - Probing the Mysteries of the Human
Mind. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc, 1998.
19. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1986.
20. Wilf R, Tyano S, Munitz H, Wijsinbeek H. Internal body image of the brain. Psychotherapy and
Psychosomatics 1983; 39: 129-135.
21. Fisher G, Fisher J, Stark R. The Body Image in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Boston: Little Brown, 1980.
22. Levinson R, Powell B, Steelman LC. Social location, significant others and body image among
adolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly 1986; 49: 330–337.
23. Bond FW, Dryden W. Handbook of Brief Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002.
24. Robinson E, Rumsey N, Partridge J. An evaluation of the impact of social interaction skills training
for facially disfigured people. Br J Plastic Surg 1996; 49: 281–289.
25. Puhl R, Brownell KD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Res 2001; 9: 788–805.
26. Lerner RM, Jovanovic J. The role of body image in psychosocial development across the life
span: A developmental contextual perspective. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T editors. Body Images:
Development, Deviance, and Change. New York: Guilford Press, 1990.
27. Le Breton D. Antropologia corpului ºi modernitatea. Timiºoara: Ed. Amarcord, 2002.
Published
2019-11-14
Section
HISTORY OF MEDICINE