ADNEXAL MASSES IN PREGNANCY: A TWO- CENTER EXPERIENCE

  • T. BUTUREANU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • Irina STOIAN “Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Iasi
  • Ana-Maria APETREI Roman Municipal Emergency Hospital, Roman, Neamt
  • Roxana DUMITRASCU “Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Iasi
  • Demetra SOCOLOV “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • R. SOCOLOV “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • C. ILEA “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the characteristics of adnexal masses in pregnancy diagnosed and managed in our centers. Material and methods: This study was conducted in the interval January 2008-December 2017 in two major centers. Included in the study were pregnant women diagnosed with adnexal masses detected by ultrasound or incidentally during cesarean delivery. Adnexal masses were evaluated ultrasonically and histopathologicaly. Results: The incidence of adnexal masses in pregnancy identified in our study was 0.31 %. Prenatal diagnosis of adnexal masses was made in 140 cases (66.6 %), 70 cases (33.3 %) being diagnosed during cesarean section. The mean size of all adnexal masses was 6.8 cm. Histopathologically, the vast majority of adnexal masses were benign tumors. The most common complication of adnexal masses during pregnancy was ovarian torsion. Conclusions: It is very important to know that adnexal masses can progress rapidly and can be life-threatening for the mother and fetus; thus it is absolutely necessary to develop and implement specific diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Author Biographies

T. BUTUREANU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine
“Elena-Doamna” Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Iasi

Demetra SOCOLOV, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine
“Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Iasi

R. SOCOLOV, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine
“Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Iasi

C. ILEA, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine
Department of Mother and Child Medicine
“Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Iasi

References

1. Yu C, Wang J, Lu W, Xie X, Cheng X1, Li X. Analysis of adnexal mass managed during cesarean section. Adv Clin Exp Med 2019; 4: 447-452.
2. Mukhopadhyay A, Shinde A, Naik R. Ovarian cysts and cancer in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2016; 33: 58-72.
3. Grimm D, Woelber L, Trillsch F, et al. Clinical management of epithelial ovarian cancer during pregnancy. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50: 963-971.
4. Cavaco-Gomes J, Jorge Moreira C, Rocha A, Mota R, Paiva V, Costa A. Investigation and Manage-ment of Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016: 3012802.
5. Meys EM, Kaijser J, Kruitwagen RF, Slangen BF, Van Calster B, Aertgeerts B, Verbakel JY, Tim-merman D, Van Gorp T. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2016; 58: 17-29.
6. Giuntoli R, Vang R, Bristow R. Evaluation and management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 492-505.
7. Ngu SF, Cheung VY, Pun TC. Surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. JSLS 2014; 18: 71-75.
8. Wang PH, Chang WH, Cheng MH, Horng HC . Management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35: 597-598.
9. Sherard GB 3, Hodson CA, Williams HJ, Semer DA, Hadi HA, Tait DL. Adnexal masses and preg-nancy: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 358-362.
10. Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D, et al. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 2010; 14: c6839.
11. Chiang G, Levine D. Imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 805-819.
12. Sarandokou A, Protonotariou E, Rizos D. Tumor markers in biological fluids associated with preg-nancy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2007; 44:151-156.
13. Goh W, Rincon M, Bohrer J, et al. Persistent ovarian masses and pregnancy outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 1090-1093.
14. Türkçüoğlu I, Meydanli MM, Engin-Ustün Y, Ustün Y, Kafkasli A.Evaluation of histopathological features and pregnancy outcomes of pregnancy associated adnexal masses. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 29: 107-109.
15. Han SN, Verheecke M, Vandenbroucke T, et al. Management of gynecological cancers during preg-nancy. Curr Oncol Rep 2014; 16: 415-420.
16. Hasson J, Tsafrir Z, Azem F, Bar-On S, Almog B, Mashiach R, et al. Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 1-6.
17. Pansky M, Feingold M, Maymon R, Ben Ami I, Halperin R, Smorgick N. Maternal adnexal torsion in pregnancy is associated with significant risk of recurrence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009; 16: 551-553.
18. Spencer CP, Roberts PJ. Management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 8: 14-19.
Published
2019-12-29