• Irina GRADINARU “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • Mirela-Fernanda ZALTARIOV “Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Iasi
  • Bianca-Iulia CIUBOTARU “Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Iasi


The aim of this study is to characterize and compare different alginate impression materials used in dental medicine. For this, we have prepared three different commercially available impression materials which have been characterized through the FTIR-ATR technique, thus highlighting rapidly and easily functionalized groups contained in these materials. This is possible as consequence of the absorption of electromagnetic radiation at certain frequencies that are associated with the vibrations specific to each type of chemical bond existing in the analyzed molecule. The materials used for this study were three impression materials commercially available (Kromopan and Alginor-ortho from Lascod, and Tropicalgin from Zhermack). For the spectral analysis a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany) was used, and the spectra were obtained in the ATR (Attenuated Total Reflectance) mode, at room temperature in the range of 4000-600 cm‒1 with a resolution of 4 cm‒1. Spectral ranges results are shown for each material, as well as the deconvoluted spectra for the most representative ranges. The alginate composition for each of the materials has been calculated and based on the obtained results we can indicate the use of these materials for the impression step in indirect restorations, as study models and casts and for fabrication of primary casts.

Author Biographies

Irina GRADINARU, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Dental Medicine
Department of Implantology, Removable Dentures, Technology

Mirela-Fernanda ZALTARIOV, “Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Iasi

Department of Inorganic Polymers

Bianca-Iulia CIUBOTARU, “Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Iasi

Department of Inorganic Polymers


1. Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa J. Dental Impression Materials and Techniques: Dental Clinics of North America 2017; 61(4): 779-796.
2. Rubel BS. Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry: Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 629-646.
3. Petcu A, Nemțoi A, Pașca S, et al. Scanning Electron Microscopy Investigation of Bone around Two Different Sandblasted Acids Etched Titanium Implant Surfaces in Diabetic Rats. Revista de Chimie 2015; 66 (9): 1331-1335.
4. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials, 9th ed: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2018.
5. Bonsor SJ, Pearson GJ. A clinical guide to applied dental materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier / Churchill Livingstone 2013.
6. Narayan R. Encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. Amsterdam: Boston: Elsevier 2019, 166-167.
7. Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Herford AS, et al. Alginate Materials and Dental Impression Technique: A Current State of the Art and Application to Dental Practice. Mar Drugs 2018; 17(1): 18.
8. Zarrintaj P, Rezaei S, Jafari SH, et al. Impression materials for dental prosthesis. Advanced Dental Biomaterials 2019; 1: 197-215.
9. Nandini V, Vidyashree, Chandrasekharan NK. Alginate impressions: A practical perspective: Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2008; 11(1): 37-41.
10. Dilip A, Gupta R, Geiger Z. Dental Alginate Impressions: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing 2020: Available from:
11. Stuart B. Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2004.
12. Grdadolnik J. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy: Its advantages and limitations: Acta Chimica Slovenica 2002: (49): 631-642.