• Simona Elena LUNCANU Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Iasi, Romania
  • Lavinia-Maria POP “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Romania
  • Magdalena IORGA “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi


The aim of the study was to identify the factors that are related to the women’s desire to avoid a new pregnancy. Material and methods: A total of 197 mothers were questioned about the pregnancy after giving birth, and the study collected data about their sexual-related lives, the satisfaction with their relationship with partners and medical team, peripartum aspects, and their desire to have a new pregnancy in the next period, using the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale (DAP), a psychometric scale. The analysis of the data was done using the SPSS program, version 24. Results: The analysis of the data revealed that women declared that they were mostly satisfied with the relationships they had with their gynecologists (M = 5.46 ± 1.59), the medical care they received from the nurses (M = 5.49 ± 1.43), the hospitalization conditions (M = 6.05 ± 1.26), the hospital food (M = 5.86 ± 1.33), and the provision of medical equipment in the hospital (M = 6.04 ± 1.11). The DAP subscales revealed the following results: Cognitive Desire and Preferences - M = 20.26 ± 3.79; Affective Feelings and Attitudes - M = 10.47 ± 3.56; and Anticipated Practical Consequences - M = 7.93 ± 3.22 for a total DAP score of about M = 37.56 ± 10.75 with scores ranging from 13 (0.6%, N = 1) to 56 (2.3%, N = 4). Married women had a significantly lower score on the DAP scale, both compared to women who lived in cohabitation and compared to those who no longer maintained a relationship with the child’s father. More results were obtained considering the variables age at first sexual contact, level of education, marital status, intended or unintended pregnancy, and satisfaction with medical care during pregnancy. Conclusions: There are a lot of factors that influence the desire of women to avoid a new pregnancy, and ob-gyn doctors and psychologists should take them into consideration when medical care is provided to mothers who have a pregnancy within a short time after giving birth.

Author Biographies

Lavinia-Maria POP, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences

Magdalena IORGA, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Faculty of Medicine


1. The Global Economy. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/birth_rate/ accessed April 10th, 2023.
2. McKay A. Trends in teen pregnancy in Canada with comparisons to USA and England/Wales. Cana-dian Journal of Human Sexuality 2006; 15(3/4): 157-162.
3. Wong SP, Twynstra J, Gilliland JA, Cook JL, Seabrook JA. Risk factors and birth outcomes associated with teenage pregnancy: a Canadian sample. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology 2020; 33(2): 153-159.
4. de Angelis C, Nardone A, Garifalos F, et al. Smoke, alcohol and drug addiction and female fertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2020; 18(1): 1-26.
5. Gomez AM, Arteaga S, Ingraham N, Arcara J, Villaseñor E. It’s not planned, but is it okay? The acceptability of unplanned pregnancy among young people. Women’s Health Issues 2018; 28(5): 408-414.
6. Macutkiewicz J, MacBeth A. Intended adolescent pregnancy: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Adolescent Research Review 2017; 2: 113-129.
7. Duma OO, Rosu ST, Manole M, Petrariu FD, Constantin B. Disparities in the access to primary healthcare in rural areas from the county of Iasi-Romania. Med Surg J - Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2014; 118(3): 743-748.
8. Akella D, Jordan M. Impact of social and cultural factors on teen pregnancy. Journal of Health Dis-parities Research & Practice 2015; 8(1); 41-61.
9. Mohr R, Carbajal J, Sharma BB. The influence of educational attainment on teenage pregnancy in low-income countries: A systematic literature review. Journal of social work in the global community 2019; 4(1): 2 / doi: 10.5590/JSWGC.2019.04.1.02
10. Dičkutė J, Padaiga Ž, Grabauskas VJ, Nadišauskienė RJ, Basys V, Gaižauskienė A. Maternal socio-economic factors and the risk of low birth weight in Lithuania. Medicina 2004; 40(5): 475-482.
11. Korenčan S, Pinter B, Grebenc M, Verdenik I. The outcomes of pregnancy and childbirth in adolescents in Slovenia. Slovenian Journal of Public Health 2017; 56(4): 268-275.
12. Lucero SM, Pargament KI, Mahoney A, DeMaris A. Links between religious and spiritual coping and adjustment among fathers and mothers during first pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 2013; 31(3): 309-322.
13. Jabeen M, Gul F, Wazir F, Javed N. Knowledge, attitude and practices of contraception in women of reproductive age. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences 2011; 9(2): 223-229.
14. Mirzaee F, Hasanpoor-Azghady SB, Amiri-Farahani L. Correlation between religious coping, demo-graphic and fertility factors, and pregnancy anxiety of Iranian primiparous women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22(1): 1-9.
15. Rocca CH, Ralph LJ, Wilson M, Gould H, Foster DG. Psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure prospective pregnancy preferences: the desire to avoid pregnancy scale. Medical care 2019; 57(2): 152-158.
16. Hall JA, Barrett G, Stephenson JM, Edelman NL, Rocca C. Desire to Avoid Pregnancy scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences. BMJ Sexual & Re-productive Health 2023 / doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201750.
17. Whybrow R, Webster LM, Seed PT, Sandall J, Chappell LC. The effectiveness of decision aids for pregnancy related decision-making in women with pre-pregnancy morbidity; systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022; 22(1): 81 / doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04402-x.
18. Killingley J. Sustainable birth: case-loading. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2016; 26(4): 452-453.
19. Weitzman A, Barber JS, Kusunoki Y, England P. Desire for and to avoid pregnancy during the transi-tion to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family 2017; 79(4): 1060-1075.
20. Clark CJ, Silverman J, Khalaf IA, et al. Intimate partner violence and interference with women’s efforts to avoid pregnancy in Jordan. Studies in family planning 2008; 39(2): 123-132.
21. Carpenter E, Everett BG, Greene MZ, Haider S, Hendrick CE, Higgins JA. Pregnancy (im) possibili-ties: Identifying factors that influence sexual minority women’s pregnancy desires. Social work in health care 2020; 59(3): 180-198.
22. Aiken AR, Borrero S, Callegari LS, Dehlendorf C. Rethinking the pregnancy planning paradigm: unintended conceptions or unrepresentative concepts? Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health 2016; 48(3): 147-151.
23. Kuroki LM, Allsworth JE, Redding CA, Blume JD, Peipert JF. Is a previous unplanned pregnancy a risk factor for a subsequent unplanned pregnancy ? American Journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2008; 199(5): 517-e1.
24. Socolov DG, Iorga M, Carauleanu A, Ilea C, Blidaru I, Boiculese L, Socolov RV. Pregnancy during adolescence and associated risks: an 8-year hospital-based cohort study (2007-2014) in Romania, the country with the highest rate of teenage pregnancy in Europe. BioMed Research International 2017; Article ID 9205016 / doi: 10.1155/2017/9205016.
25. Iorga M, Pop LM, Gimiga N, Păduraru L, Diaconescu S. Assessing the Opinion of Mothers about School-Based Sexual Education in Romania, the Country with the Highest Rate of Teenage Pregnancy in Europe. Medicina 2021; 57(8): 841.