WOMEN’S ANXIETY AND PERCEPTIONS OF PAP TESTS IN NORTH-EASTERN ROMANIA

Authors

  • Irina Liviana STOIAN Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • Maria MARCHIS “Arcadia” Hospital Iasi, Romania / Department of Clinical Psychology
  • Demetra SOCOLOV Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • Magdalena IORGA Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • Samar NASSOUH Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi
  • C. G. ILEA Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

Abstract

Cervical cancer is still a substantial global public health issue among women. In the prevention and early diagnosis, cervical cancer screening plays a crucial role (1). However, acceptance of and participation in this screening are influenced by various factors. Woman’s psychological status, including stress, anxiety, depression, or individual perception of health, can influence the decision to participate in cervical cancer screening. The current study aimed to investigate the psychological impact of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing in women in the North-eastern Romania. Materials and methods: This study was conducted using a questionnaire specifically developed for this study, which included structured questions aimed to assess various aspects of the psychological impact of cervical cancer screening. The statistical analysis for this study was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26. Results: The study indicated a significant positive association between the perception that the Pap test was painful and anxiety related to unfavorable results and fertility concerns fertility. Younger women tend to have their Pap test more often than older women. Women with previous negative Pap test results tend to have lower levels of anxiety related to unfavorable results compared to women previously experiencing positive Pap test results. The results indicated that the regression model (i.e., age, perceptions about the Pap test - cost, pain, and embarrassment) did not significantly predict the anxiety related to unfavorable results. Conclusions: Our study highlights important psychosocial aspects related to cervical cancer screening and provides a foundation for improving health promotion services and risk awareness programs.

Author Biographies

  • Irina Liviana STOIAN, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine

  • Demetra SOCOLOV, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine
    “Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinical Hospital, Iasi, Romania

  • Magdalena IORGA, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine

  • Samar NASSOUH, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine
    “Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinical Hospital, Iasi, Romania

  • C. G. ILEA, Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi

    Faculty of Medicine
    “Cuza-Vodă” Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinical Hospital, Iasi, Romania

References

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68(6): 394-424.
2. World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). GLOBOCAN 2021: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2020.
3. Raportul de garda (2023, 26 februarie) Profilul României privind cancerul 2023: cancerul de col uterin și prevenirea infecțiilor HPV https://raportuldegarda.ro/profil-romania-cancer-2023-col-uterin-infectie-hpv.
4. Peretto M, Drehmer LBR, Bello HMR. On˜ao comparecimento ao exame preventivo do cˆancer de colo uterino: raz˜oes declaradas e sentimentos envolvidos, Cogitare Enferm 2012; 17.
5. do Nascimento RG, A. Araújo, Falta de periodicidade na realizaç˜ao do exame citopatol´ogico do colo uterino: motivaç˜oes das mulheres, REME Rev. Min. Enferm 2014; 557-564.
6. Aguilar RP, D.A. Soares, Barreiras `a realizaç˜ao do exame Papanicolau: perspectivas de usu´arias e profissionais da Estrat´egia de Saúde da Família da cidade de Vit´oria da Conquista-BA, Physis 2015; 25: 359-379.
7. Oliveira PSD, Cardoso de Miranda SV, Sanches GLG, Barbosa HA. Conociendo la fidelidad de las mujeres al examen de c´ancer de cuello de útero, Cultura de los cuidados: Revista de Enfermería y Humanidades 2018; 22(52): 178-188.
8. Abah AU, Omokhapue A, Adewole A, Usifoh N, Iyanuoluwa OA. Environmental and psychosocial predictors of cervical cancer screening among women in Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja, North Central, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health 2023; 27(7): 32-42.
9. Rask M, Swahnberg K, Lindell G, Oscarsson M. Women’s experiences of abnormal Pap smear results-a qualitative study. Sex Reprod Healthcare 2017; 12: 3-8.
10. Rask M, Oscarsson M, Lindell G, Swahnberg K. Women with abnormal Pap smear result: a qualitative study of Swedish healthcare professionals’ experiences. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 25(6): 980-991.
11. Oscarsson MG. Psychological adjustment of women in cervical cancer screening. Curr Women Health Revi 2011; 7(4): 353-357.
12. Thangarajah F, Einzmann T, Bergauer F, et al. Cervical screening program and the psychological impact of an abnormal Pap smear: a self-assessment questionnaire study of 590 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 293(2): 391-398.
13. Natalie Armstrong, Veronica James, Mary Dixon-Woods, The role of primary care professionals in women’s experiences of cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study. Family Practice 2012; 29(4): 462-466.
14. Al-Naggar RA, Low WY, Isa ZM. Knowledge and barriers towards cervical cancer screening among young women in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010; 11(4): 867-873.
15. Wong LP. Wong YL, Low WY, Khoo EM, Shuib R. Cervical cancer screening attitudes and beliefs of Malaysian women who have never had a Pap smear: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Med 2008; 15 (4): 289-292.
16. Waller J, Bartoszek M, Marlow L, Wardle J. Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in Eng-land: a population-based survey. J Med Screen 2009; 16(4): 199-204.
17. Saraiya M, King JL, Thompson T, Watson M. Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Aged 18-30 Years - United States, 2000-2010 JAMA 2013; 51: 1038-1042.
18. Lee EE, Eun Y, Lee SY, Nandy K. Age-related differences in health beliefs regarding cervical cancer screening among Korean American women. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 2012; 23(3): 237-245.
19. Marlow LA V, Ryan M, Waller J. Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2020; 96(1): 20-25.
20. Drolet M, Brisson M, Maunsell E, et al. The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result. Psychooncology 2012; 21: 1071-1081.
21. Kitchener HC, Fletcher I, Roberts C, et al. The psychosocial impact of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening-a study within a randomized trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 743-748.
22. Maissi E, Marteau TM, Hankins M, et al. Psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: cross sectional questionnaire study. BMJ 2004; 328: 1293.
23. McCaffery K, Waller J, Forrest S, et al. Testing positive for human papillomavirus in routine cervical screening: examination of psychosocial impact. BJOG 2004; 111: 1437-1443.
24. Frederiksen ME, Njor S, Lynge E, Rebolj M. Psychological effects of diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review. Sex Transm Infect 2015; 91(4): 248-256.
25. Jentschke M, Lehmann R, Drews N, Hansel A, Schmitz M, Hillemanns P. Psychological distress in cervical cancer screening: results from a German online survey. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 302(3): 699-705.
26. McBride E, Marlow AV, Forster AS, et al. Anxiety and distress following receipt of results from routine HPV primary testing in cervical screening: The psychological impact of primary screening (PIPS) study. Int J Cancer 2020; 146(8): 2113-2121.
27. Lyimo FS, Beran TN. Demographic, knowledge, attitudinal, and accessibility factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in a rural district of Tanzania: three public policy implications. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 22.
28. Aswathy S, Quereshi MA, Kurian B, et al. Cervical cancer screening: Current knowledge and practice among women in a rural population of Kerala, India. Indian J Med Res 2012; 136: 205.
29. Dahiya N, Aggarwal K, Singh MC, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the screening of cervical cancer among women in New Delhi, India. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019; 31: 240.

Additional Files

Published

2024-09-18