PERCEPTION OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS ON RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY PRACTICES IN THE WORKPLACE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22551/1qdz2028Abstract
Radiation protection aims to reduce unnecessary exposure to radiation to minimize the harmful effects of ionizing radiation, this goal is achieved by using different means and methods of radiation protection. The aim of this study was to analyze the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of medical personnel in the N-E Region of Romania regarding radiation protection and the effects of ionizing radiation. Materials and methods: The study was carried out based on the use of a structured questionnaire for data collection, a questionnaire that was distributed to the medical staff (doctors, nurses, radiologists) from hospitals and medical centers in the N-E Region of Romania. Results: The results show that most respondents know about the stochastic and deterministic biological effects of ionizing radiation, but a significant group has incomplete, average, or uncertain knowledge about this topic. Conclusions: These aspects suggest a need for additional education in the field of radiation protection in the workplace.
References
1. Frane N. Bitterman A. Radiation Safety and Protection. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing 2024.
2. Eder Heinrich. X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated. Rofo 2023; 195(3): 234-243.
3. Garg T. Shrigiriwar A. Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2022; 31(4): 939-945.
4. Luan FJ. Zhang J. Mak KC. Liu ZH. Wang HQ. Low Radiation X-rays: Benefiting People Globally by Reducing Cancer Risks. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18(1): 73-80.
5. Yeung AWK. Parvanov ED. Horbańczuk JO, et al. Are dental x-rays safe? Content analysis of English and Chinese YouTube videos. Digit Health 2023: 9: 20552076231179053.
6. Choi TW. Chung JW. Kwon Y. Modified design of x-ray protective clothing to enhance radiation pro-tection for interventional radiologists. Med Phys 2023; 50(6): 3825-3832.
7. Whitebird RR. Solberg LI. Chu PW. Smith-Bindman R. Strategies for dose optimization: views from health care systems. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19(4): 534-541.
8. Boice J Jr. Dauer LT. Kase KR. Mettler FA Jr . Vetter RJ. Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers. Br J Radiol 2020; 93(1112): 20200282.
9. Pozzessere. C. Optimizing Communication of Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging. the Radiologist Challenge. Tomography 2023; 9(2): 717-720.
10. Goula A. Chatzis A. Stamouli MA. Kelesi M. Kaba E. Brilakis E. Assessment of Health Professionals' Attitudes on Radiation Protection Measures. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(24): 13380.
11. Yurt A. Ayrancıoğlu C. Kılınç G. Ergönül E. Knowledge. attitude. and behavior of Turkish dentists about radiation protection and radiation safety. Dento maxillo facial Radiol 2022; 51(1): 20210120.
12. Whitebird RR. Solberg LI. Chu PW. Smith-Bindman R. Strategies for Dose Optimization: Views from Health Care Systems. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19(4): 534-541.
13. Oakley PA. Harrison DE. Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector. Dose Response 2020; 18(2): 1559325820921641.
14. Najjar R. Radiology’s Ionizing Radiation Paradox: Weighing the Indispensable Against the Detrimental in Medical Imaging. Cureus 2023; 15(7): E41623.
15. Ghadikolaei RF. Ghorbani H. Seyed MM. Gorji KE. Moudi E. Seyed MS. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity effects of x-rays on the oral mucosa epithelium at different fields of view: A cone beam computed tomography technique. Caspian J Intern Med 2023; 14(1): 121-127.
16. Park SM. Kim HC. Lee MS. Kim CY. A randomized comparison of estimated radiation exposure be-tween Low and conventional dose protocol during invasive coronary angiography (ERICA trial): Pilot study. Eur J Radiol 2020; 129: 109-120.
17. Etzel R. König AM. Keil B. Fiebich M. Mahnken AH. Effectiveness of a new radiation protection system in the interventional radiology setting. Eur J Radiol 2018: 106: 56-61.
18. Choi AD. Thomas DM. Lee J. et al. 2020 Guideline for Training Cardiology and Radiology Trainees as Independent Practitioners (Level II) and Advanced Practitioners (Level III) in Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: A Statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 14(1): 272-287.
19. Norms regarding the basic requirements of radiological safety. approved by the Order of the Minister of Health. the Minister of National Education and the President of the National Commission for the Control of Nuclear Activities no. 752/3.978/136/2018. Monitorul Oficial al României. Part I no. 517 bis of 25.06.2018.
20. Umaru B. Yusuf SD. Idris MM. Hambali SU. Assessment of Attitude. Behaviors and Knowledge of Health and Medical Staff on Radiation Safety Awareness and Protection Compliance: A Case Study of Two Hospitals in Maiduguri. Nigeria. African Journal of Advances in Science and Technology Research 2024; 1: 36-45.
21. Jeyasugiththan J. Dissanayake DMTPB. Kohomba Kadawala IMCWB. Satharasinghe DM. Assessment of the awareness of radiation protection and related concepts among nursing staff mainly working in diagnostic imaging units. cath-labs and operation theatres in Sri Lanka: A survey-based study. Radiography (London) 2023; 29(2): 319-326.
22. Freudenberg LS. Beyer T. Subjective perception of radiation risk. J Nucl Med 2011: 52(2): 29S-35S.
23. Hammick M. Tutt A. Tait DM. Knowledge and perception regarding radiotherapy and radiation in patients receiving radiotherapy: a qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care 1998; 7(2): 103-12.
24. Jafri MA. Farrukh S. Zafar R. Ilyas N. A survey on radiation protection awareness at various hospitals in Karachi. Pakistan. Heliyon 2022; 8(11): e11236.
25. Choi K. An empirical analysis of the relationship between understanding. attitudes. and practices toward radiation – Focusing on the population eligible for South Korean National Health Insurance Service Ex-amination. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 2023; 16(4): 100671.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Medical-Surgical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT
Once an article is accepted for publication, MSJ requests a transfer of copyrights for published articles.
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM FOR
REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ A SOCIETĂȚII DE MEDICI ȘI NATURALIȘTI DIN IAȘI /
THE MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF PHYSICIANS AND NATURALISTS FROM IASI
We, the undersigned authors of the manuscript entitled
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
warrant that this manuscript, which is submitted for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, has not been published and it is not under consideration for publication in another journal.
- we give the consent for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in printed and electronic format and we transfer unconditioned and complete the copyright of this manuscript to the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in the event of its acceptance.
- the manuscript does not break the intellectual property rights of any other person.
- we have read the submitted version of the manuscript and we are fully responsible for the content.
Names and signatures of authors / copyright owners (the following sequence is the authorship of the article):
- ______________________________/_________________________
- ______________________________/_________________________
- ______________________________/_________________________
N.B. All the authors must sign this form
