HEMOGLOBIN A1C AND BODY MASS INDEX AS PREDICTORS OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING AND GLUCOMETER READINGS IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES

Authors

  • Catalina Georgiana TUDOR Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • D. V. TIMOFTE Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Oana Viola BADULESCU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Iustina Petra CONDRIUC Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • A. CIOBICA Ioan Haulica Institute / Apollonia University, Iasi, Romania
  • R. C. TUDOR Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • B. DOROFTEI Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/

Keywords:

HEMOGLOBIN, BODY MASS INDEX, PREDICTORS, CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING, PREGNANT WOMEN, GESTATIONAL DIABETES

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between differences in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and glucometer measurements and the clinical factors hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) in women with gestational diabetes. We also evaluated if HbA1c and BMI could serve as predictors of CGM‑glucometer differences. Materials and methods: HbA1c was measured both continuously and categorically (≥5.9% vs <5.9%), and BMI was calculated in kg/m². An independent-samples t-test compared CGM differences between the two HbA1c categories. Pearson correlations examined relationships between CGM differences and HbA1c and BMI. A multiple linear regression assessed whether HbA1c and BMI predicted CGM differences. Results: Patients with elevated HbA1c (≥5.9%) had significantly higher CGM differences (M = 28.71, SD = 0.73) compared to those with lower HbA1c (M = 23.17, SD = 0.91), t(42) = -19.94, p < 0.001. CGM differences were very strongly correlated with HbA1c (r = .996, p < 0.001) and BMI (r = .984, p < 0.001). In the multiple regression model, only HbA1c significantly predicted CGM differences (B = 26.52, SE = 2.18, p < 0.001), whereas BMI was not statistically significant. The model explained 99.3% of the variance in CGM differences (R² = 0.993). Conclusions. The findings of our study suggest that HbA1c is strongly associated with CGM-glucometer differences, while BMI, despite a strong correlation, does not independently predict discrepancies when HbA1c is considered. These results underscore the importance of HbA1c in assessing CGM accuracy. 

Author Biographies

  • Catalina Georgiana TUDOR, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Cuza-Voda Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iasi, Romania

  • D. V. TIMOFTE, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Sf. Spiridon County Clinical Emergency Hospital, Iasi, Romania

  • Oana Viola BADULESCU, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Sf. Spiridon County Clinical Emergency Hospital, Iasi, Romania

  • Iustina Petra CONDRIUC, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Cuza-Voda Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iasi, Romania

  • A. CIOBICA, Ioan Haulica Institute / Apollonia University, Iasi, Romania

    Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania
    Olga Necrasov Center, Romanian Academy, Iasi, Romania
    Academy of Romanian Scientists, Bucharest, Romania

  • R. C. TUDOR, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Dr. Iacob Czihac Military Emergency Clinical Hospital Iasi, Romania

  • B. DOROFTEI, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

    Cuza-Voda Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iasi, Romania
    Origyn Fertility Center, Iasi, Romania

References

1. Chai TY, Leathwick S, Agarwal MM, Sacks DB, Simmons D. Continuous glucose monitoring in gestational diabetes mellitus: hope or hype? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2025; 227: 112389.

2. Balaji B, Hannah W, Popova PV, et al. The Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Comparison to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2025: 19322968251357873.

3. Malkani S, Mordes J. The implications of using Hemoglobin A1C for diagnosing Diabetes Mellitus. The American Journal of Medicine 2011; 124(5): 395-401.

4. Nuttall FQ. Body mass index: obesity, BMI, and health: a critical review. Nutrition Today 2015; 50(3): 117-128.

5. Abraham MB, Smith G, Choo A, et al. Impact of body composition on the accuracy of a Medtronic Guardian continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 2023; 25(8): 549-553.

6. Wei J, et al, Baseline HbA1c to Identify High-Risk Gestational Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016; 39(11): 1960-1967.

7. Yu F, Aris A, Tan D, Li CJ. Application and utility of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnancy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2019; 10: 697.

8. Lai W, Weng H, Yang X, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring compared with self‑monitoring of blood glucose in gestational diabetes patients with HbA1c < 6%: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023; 14: 1174239.

9. Zhu Y, Yang H, Gao J, Li X. Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring on maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetic Medicine 2021; 38(8): e14522.

10. Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care 2019; 42(8): 1593-1603.

11. Guo H, Lv Y, Zhang X, Wang Q. Early continuous glucose monitoring‑derived glycemic patterns are associated with subsequent insulin resistance and gestational diabetes mellitus development during pregnancy. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 2024; 16: 112.

12. Rodacki M, Krakauer M, Franco DR, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring system in diabetes in pregnancy: A narrative review. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 2025; 17: 322.

13. Murphy HR, Rayman G. Continuous glucose monitoring in gestational diabetes mellitus: Evidence and clinical implications. Current Diabetes Reports 2020; 20(11): 65.

14. Kestila L, Kettunen J, Vanhala M. Continuous glucose monitoring versus self‑monitoring of blood glucose in gestational diabetes: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2022; 22: 641.

Additional Files

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

INTERNAL MEDICINE - PEDIATRICS