ASSESSMENT OF ROOT CANAL OBTURATION AND THE ADHESION OF ENDODONTIC SEALERS TO THE DENTIN WALLS OF THE ROOT

Authors

  • Corina-Alexandra CONCITĂ Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Monica-Silvia TATARCIUC Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • B. C. CONCITĂ Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Mihaela SĂLCEANU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Cristina ANTOHI Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • S. ANDRIAN Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/MSJ.2026.02.21

Abstract

This study aims to compare the quality of root canal obturation achieved using different obturation techniques and to evaluate the adaptation of the interface between epoxy resin- based sealants and gutta-percha to the dentin walls of the root canal. Materials and methods: Thirty-six extracted single-rooted human teeth were used, prepared according to a standardized protocol and filled with gutta-percha using different techniques (lateral condensation and vertical hot condensation), to evaluate, through radiological analysis (retro-dento-alveolar radiography) and optical microscopy, the following aspects: the quality and homogeneity of the root fillings, the adhesion of the sealer to the dentin root walls, and the apical and coronal seal of the endodontic filling. The data were statistically analyzed to identify differences between techniques (p < 0.05), using the F-test and ANOVA. Results: Radiographic analysis revealed significant differences in the homogeneity of the filling and the presence of voids between techniques, with vertical hot condensation yielding the best results, particularly in the apical third. Optical microscopy confirmed better adaptation of the sealants in the case of thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques, while lateral condensation showed a higher incidence of marginal voids at the apical level. Conclusions: The obturation technique significantly influences the quality of root canal obturation. Vertical hot condensation ensures homogeneity and optimal adaptation. Combined radiographic and optical microscopy evaluation provides a comprehensive method for assessing obturation results.

References

1. Akhtar H, Naz F, Hasan A, et al. Exploring the most effective apical seal for contemporary bio-ceramic and conventional endodontic sealers using three obturation techniques. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59(3): 567 / doi: 10.3390/medicina59030567.

2. El Ouarti I, Chala S, Sakout M, Abdallaoui F. Prevalence and risk factors of apical periodontitis in endodontically treated teeth: cross sectional study in an adult Moroccan subpopulation. BMC Oral Health 2021; 21(1): 124 / doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01491-6.

3. Ferreira DM, Barbosa IB, Soares AJ, et al. Quality of root canal filling and its association with apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2022; 55(4): 389-407 / doi: 10.1111/iej.13672.

4. Sălceanu M, Dascălu C, Melian A, et al. Assessment of periodontitis risk factors in endodontically treated teeth: a cross-sectional study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14(17): 1972 / doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171972.

5. Al Sabawi NA, Al Hadithi TS, Al Maweri SA. Comparison of the quality of root canal obturation using warm vertical compaction and single cone technique: an in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2020; 10(1): 63-68 / doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_296_19.

6. Badawy RE, Mohamed DA. Evaluation of new bio ceramic endodontic sealers: an in vitro study. Dent Med Probl 2022; 59(1): 85-92 / doi: 10.17219/dmp/143047.

7. Barakat R, Amin W, Shaker O, El Sayed MH. Comparison of apical leakage in different obturation techniques: a dye penetration study. J Endod 2021; 47(2): 293-300 / doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020. 10.014

8. Nanda Z, Singh R, Kamble PP, et al. Efficacy of different root canal irrigating solutions in removing smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. Cureus 2023; 15(9): e44618 / doi: 10.7759/cureus.44618.

9. Liang Y, Yue L. Evolution and development: engine driven endodontic rotary nickel titanium instruments. Int J Oral Sci 2022; 14(1): 1-9 / doi: 10.1038/s41368-021-00154-0.

10. Machado R, Nantes B, Guimarães DA, et al. Influence of concentration, irrigation method, and root canal third on intratubular penetration of sodium hypochlorite-a broad statistical analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2023; 15(11): e882-e894 / doi: 10.4317 /jced.60955.

11. Sălceanu M, Dascălu C, Giuroiu C, et al. CBCT PAI scores in root-filled teeth with endodontic treatment failure: a retrospective study. Rom J Oral Rehabil 2024; 16(2): 446-455 / doi: 10.62610/ RJOR.2024.2.16.39.

12. Alves Dos Santos GN, Faria E Silva AL, Ribeiro VL, et al. Is the quality of root canal filling obtained by cone beam computed tomography associated with periapical lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26(8): 5105-5116 / doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04558-y.

13. Laukkanen E, Vehkalahti MM, Kotiranta AK. Radiographic outcome of root canal treatment in general dental practice: tooth type and quality of root filling as prognostic factors. Acta Odontol Scand 2021; 79(1): 37-42 / doi: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1773534.

14. Lamira A, Mazzi Chaves JF, Nicolielo LFP, et al. CBCT based assessment of root canal treatment using micro CT reference images. Imaging Sci Dent 2022; 52(3): 245-258 / doi: 10.5624/isd. 20220019.

15. Pandey P, Singh S, Gupta A, Sharma V. Evaluation of coronal sealing ability of glass ionomer cement and composite resin as intra-orifice barriers after root canal treatment: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2024; 27(1): 45-51 / doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_412_23

16. Suciu I, Pastrav O, Ilie N, Moldovan M. The irrigation and disinfection in root canal treatment— retrospective literature review. Rom J Oral Rehabil 2021; 13(1): 54-62.

17. de Macedo BM, Ordinola Zapata R, Duarte MAH, et al. Morphologic evaluation of root canals using micro computed tomography: a systematic review. J Endod 2017; 43(6): 875-881 / doi: 10. 1016/j.joen.2016.12.018.

18. Bosaid F, Aksel H, Makowka S, Azim AA. Surface and structural changes in root dentine by various chelating solutions used in regenerative endodontics. Int Endod J 2020; 53(10): 1438-1445 / doi: 10.1111/iej.13354.

19. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non- surgical root canal treatment: part 2. Influence of instrumentation and obturation quality. Int Endod J 2020; 53(2): 242-250 / doi: 10.1111/iej.13210.

20. Bartols A, Bormann C, Werner L, et al A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols. Peer J 2020; 8: e8495 / doi: 10.7717/peerj.8495.

21. Hegde S, Shetty HK, Hegde S, et al. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the smear layer removal using various chelating agents-an in vitro study. J Int Dent Med Res 2022; 15(1): 15-20.

22. Albayrak S, Yılmaz M, Kayahan MB, Nur BG. Evaluation of sealing ability of various endodontic obturation materials with micro CT analysis. BMC Oral Health 2024; 24: 112. doi: 10.1186/s 12903- 024-01129-x.

23. Amida R, Sulaiman F, Awang R, Ahmad S. Effect of warm vertical compaction versus single cone obturation on root canal filling quality: a micro CT analysis. Braz Dent J 2022; 33(5): 544-550 / doi: 10.1590/0103-644020210472.

24. Bhandi S, Abutayyem H, Al Abdulsalam S, et al. Assessment of root canal obturation quality using warm thermoplasticized gutta percha obturation techniques: a micro computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2021; 54(11): 1948-1957 / doi: 10.1111/iej.13555.

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-01