LONGITUDINAL CLINICAL STUDY ON THE PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF ROOT CARIES IN ELDERLY PATIENTS

Authors

  • Irina GRĂDINARU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Cristina Gena DASCĂLU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Magda Ecaterina ANTOHE Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Georgia Katerina CONDURACHE Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Ana-Maria FATU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/MSJ.2026.02.22

Abstract

Dental caries remains one of the most common oral diseases, with a multifactorial etiology involving biological, behavioral, socio-economic, and age-related factors. In elderly patients, physiological changes, systemic diseases, polypharmacy, reduced salivary flow, and gingival recession increase susceptibility to root caries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of coronal and root caries across different age groups and to identify the etiological factors involved in root caries by comparing caries experience and individual cariogenic risk in adult and geriatric patients. Materials and methods: The study included 293 patients examined at the Clinical Teaching Base of the Faculty of Dental Medicine Iași between 2022 and 2026. Clinical assessment included the evaluation of coronal and root caries, gingival recession, and DMFT index. Results: Socio-economic factors, systemic diseases, and medication were recorded using a standardized questionnaire. Cariogenic risk was assessed by determining salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli, resting and stimulated salivary flow, salivary buffer capacity, and caries susceptibility using the modified Snyder test. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with the significance level set at p < 0.05. Coronal caries showed the highest prevalence in the 71-80-year age group, followed by the 51-60-years group. Root caries was also most frequent in the 71-80-years group, followed by patients over 80 years. DMFT values increased with age, mainly due to the “M” component, reflecting cumulative tooth loss. Systemic diseases, xerostomia-inducing medication, gingival recession, reduced salivary parameters, and increased microbial load were associated with higher cariogenic risk. Conclusions: Root caries in elderly patients has a multifactorial etiology, influenced by age-related oral changes, systemic conditions, medication, salivary dysfunction, gingival recession, and cariogenic microorganisms. These findings support the need for individualized preventive and therapeutic strategies in geriatric dental care.

References

1. Almasvandi HR, Sahebi M, Nouri M. Epidemiological trends in dental caries among aging populations: a systematic review. J Oral Health Prev Dent 2025; 23(2): 101-110.

2. Huang L-R, Chen X, Li Y, Wang Q. Multifactorial risk assessment models for root caries in elderly patients. Caries Res 2025; 59(1): 12-21.

3. Huang X, Schwendicke F, Paris S. Root caries: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention strategies. J Dent Res 2025; 104(3): 245-253.

4. Maklennan A, Broadbent JM, Thomson WM. Global prevalence and risk indicators of root caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2025; 53(1): 1-12.

5. Lipsky MS, Su S, Crespo CJ. Xerostomia and its impact on oral health in older adults. Am J Med 2024; 137(6): 654-662.

6. Vehkalahti MM, Paunio IK, Turunen S. Oral hygiene and root caries in adults: a population-based study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2019; 47(6): 520-526.

7. Papas AS, Joshi A, Giunta JL. Prevalence and intraoral distribution of coronal and root caries in middle-aged and older adults. J Dent Res 2018; 97(7): 765-772.

8. Banting DW. The diagnosis of root caries. J Dent Educ 2001; 65(10): 991-996.

9. Carlos JP, Wolfe MD, Kingman A. The extent and severity of root caries in the United States. J Dent Res 1985; 64(2): 267-270.

10. Featherstone JD. The continuum of dental caries-evidence for a dynamic disease process. J Dent Res 2004; 83 Spec No C: C39-C42.

11. Takahashi N, Nyvad B. The role of bacteria in the caries process: ecological perspectives. J Dent Res 2011; 90(3): 294-303.

12. Marsh PD. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res. 2018; 29(1): 1-7.

13. Schwendicke F, Krois J, Gomez J. Impact of sugar consumption on caries risk: systematic review. J Dent 2020; 93: 103283.

14. Moynihan P, Kelly S. Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake. J Dent Res 2014; 93(1): 8-18.

15. Dawes C, Pedersen AM, Villa A. The functions of human saliva: a review. J Dent Res 2015; 94(12): 1667-1674.

16. Ship JA. Diagnosing, managing, and preventing salivary gland disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94(5): 659-664.

17. Johansson I, Witkowska E, Kaveh B. Salivary factors and dental caries in the elderly. Gerodon-tology.2019; 36(3): 187-195.

18. van Houte J. Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J Dent Res 1994; 73(3): 672-681.

19. Beighton D, Lynch E. Microbiological aspects of root caries. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11(4): 357-363.

20. Schüpbach P, Osterwalder V, Guggenheim B. Human root caries: microbiota of root caries lesions. Caries Res 1995; 29(6): 382-389.

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-01