SEGMENTAL VASCULAR BURDEN AND OUTCOMES IN DIABETIC VS. NON-DIABETIC CHRONIC LIMB-THREATENING ISCHEMIA AFTER ENDOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION

Authors

  • Anca DUMITRESCU-BORDIANU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Livia Genoveva BAROI Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • R. F. POPA Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • L. IACOB Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Daniela JARDAN Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Cristina DASCĂLU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • B. M. CIUNTU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • L. M. ABDULAN Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Paula-Cristina MORARIU
  • Maria Mihaela GODUN Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • A.-F OANCEA Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • A. BURLACU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Daniela Maria TANASE Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania
  • Mariana FLORIA Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/MSJ.2026.02.10

Abstract

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) progressing to chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with high morbidity and limb loss. Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly influences disease distribution and clinical outcomes. The Bollinger score, GLASS classification, and WIfI staging are complementary tools for assessing anatomical burden and limb threat. This study aimed to analyze the relationships between these scoring systems in diabetic CLTI, with particular focus on infra-popliteal versus global anatomical evaluation. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective study included 136 patients with CLTI undergoing endovascular revascularization between May 2021 and May 2023. Baseline characteristics, angiographic severity, WIfI stage, Bollinger scores (whole limb, above- and below-knee), GLASS staging (global, femoropopliteal and infra-popliteal), and outcomes (technical success, bypass conversion, major amputation, and one-year mortality) were analyzed. Results: Patients were divided into diabetic (DM, n=85) and non-diabetic (NDM, n=51) groups. Diabetic patients more frequently presented with infra-inguinal stenoses >50% (55.3% vs. 35.3%, p=0.024) but fewer complete occlusions (83.5% vs. 96.1%, p=0.028). WIfI stage 1 was more common in the DM group (54.1% vs. 33.3%, p≈0.08). Bollinger scores were lower in diabetics for the whole limb (30.07±16.34 vs. 36.78±16.09, p=0.018) and below-knee segment (20.53±15.88 vs. 26.86±13.93, p=0.015). Conclusions: Diabetic CLTI is characterized by a distal angiographic pattern with predominant infra-popliteal stenoses and lower additive Bollinger scores. Segmental infra-popliteal assessment showed stronger clinical relevance than global evaluation, with below-knee Bollinger and GLASS infra-popliteal stages most closely associated with WIfI severity. These findings support a segment-focused approach in endovascular planning for diabetic patients.

References

1. Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P, et al. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 58(1S): S1-S109.e33 / doi: 10.1016/ j.ejvs.2019.05.006.

2. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, et al. The BASIL trial: randomized comparison of bypass surgery versus angioplasty in severe limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51(5 Suppl): 5S-17S / doi: 10.1016/ j.jvs.2010.01.073.

3. Farber A, Rosenfield K, Menard MT, et al. Endovascular revascularization versus surgical bypass for CLTI: results from BEST-CLI trial. N Engl J Med 2022; 387(25): 2305-2316 / doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa2207899.

4. Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink MEL, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases. Eur Heart J 2024; 45(5): 765-830 / doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad651.

5. Bunte MC, Jacobson J, Javaheri A, et al. Patterns of arterial calcification in diabetes and their impact on revascularization. Circulation 2020; 141(1): 99-114 / doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATION AHA.119.041524.

6. Boyko EJ, Lipsky BA, Giurini JM, et al. Pathophysiology and prevention of diabetic foot com-plications. Diabetes Care 2021; 44(7): 1463-1471 / doi: 10.2337/dci21-0006.

7. Norgren L, Fowkes FGR, Aboyans V, et al. Update on peripheral artery disease: pathophysiology and management. Nat Rev Cardiol 2022; 19(12): 760-776 / doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00761-8.

8. Cerqueira LO, Duarte EG, Barros AL, et al. WIfI classification and limb outcomes after endovascular treatment for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Bras 2020; 19: e20200089 / doi: 10.1590/ 1677-5449.200089.

9. Hicks CW, Canner JK, Mathioudakis N, et al. The WIfI classification system predicts wound healing and amputation in diabetic foot ulcer patients. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71(2): 631-640 / doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.064.

10. Bollinger A. An extension of the Bollinger scoring system for the quantitative assessment of peripheral atherosclerosis. Angiology 1981; 32(4): 240-250 / doi: 10.1177/00033 197810 3200402.

11. Benson RA, Meecham L, Bate G, Bradbury AW. Disease quantified: Bollinger score reproducibility in angiographic assessment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 52(1): 88-94 / doi: 10.1016/ j.ejvs.2016.03.013.

12. Zielinski LP, Chowdhury MM, Carter M, et al. Variability in reporting Bollinger and GLASS scores: implications for standardization. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 59(4): 595-603 / doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.011.

13. Fitridge R, Hinchliffe RJ, Zierler RE, et al. IWGDF/ESVS/SVS Guidelines on the diagnosis, prognosis and management of peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65(1S): S1-S79 / doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.002.

14. Hinchliffe RJ, Forsythe RO, Apelqvist J, et al. Performance of GLASS and WIfI for predicting outcomes after revascularization in CLTI. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 62(1): 93-102 / doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.01.019.

15. 15. Mustapha JA, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Saab F, et al. Role of scoring systems in predicting technical success in diabetic CLTI. Vasc Med 2022; 27(3): 268-278 / doi: 10.1177/1358863X211071250.

16. Ferraresi R, Faglia E, Clerici G, et al. Sex-related differences and factors associated with peri-procedural mortality in chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Pers Med 2023; 13(2): 316 / doi: 10.3390/jpm13020316.

17. Hess CN, Rogers RK, Wang TY, et al. Major adverse limb events and mortality in peripheral artery disease: insights from the EUCLID trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75(5): 498-508 / doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.045.

18. Schmitt VH, Hobohm L, Vosseler M, et al. Temporal trends in hospitalizations and outcomes in diabetic vs non-diabetic peripheral artery disease. Diabet Med 2022; 39(8): e14854 / doi: 10.1111/ dme.14854.

19. Torres C, Ujueta F, Rogers E, et al. Outcomes after endovascular therapy for CLTI in diabetic patients: insights from a national registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11(5): e024593 / doi: 10.1161/ JAHA.121.024593.

20. Morosetti D, Farina A, Speziale F, et al. Infrapopliteal angioplasty outcomes in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients: a real-world multicenter experience. Int Angiol 2021; 40(3): 220-229.

21. Randon C, Jacobs B, De Ryck F, et al. Long-term outcome of infrapopliteal angioplasty in diabetic critical limb ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 60(1): 77-86 / doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020. 03.021.

22. Kim HK, Park J, Cho S, et al. Correlation of WIfI stage with angiographic findings and outcomes after revascularization. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 79: 247-256 / doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.031.

23. Anwar MA, Georgakarakos E, Antoniou GA, et al. Diabetic versus non-diabetic arterial disease: anatomical patterns and clinical implications. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 94: 76-84 / doi: 10.1016/javsg. 2022.09.025.

24. Faglia E, Clerici G, Caminiti M, et al. Evaluation of infrapopliteal angioplasty in diabetic critical limb ischemia: predictors of failure. Diabetes Care 2019; 42(6): e100-e103 / doi: 10.2337/dc19-0 152.

25. Beropoulis E, Stavroulakis K, Schwindt A, et al. Long-term outcomes of infrapopliteal angio-plasty: impact of diabetes and WIfI stage. J Endovasc Ther 2020; 27(5): 766-775 / doi: 10.1177/ 1526602820933618.

26. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA. Peripheral arterial disease: pathophysiology and natural history. In: Sidawy AN, Perler BA, editors. Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy. 9th edition Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier: 2019, 1234-1250.

27. Ferraresi R, Mauri G, Losurdo F, et al. BAD transmission and SAD distribution: a new scenario for critical limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2018; 59(5): 655-664.

28. Ucci A, Massoni CB, Perini P, et al. Patterns of arterial obstruction in chronic limb-threatening ischemia: a histopathological analysis of amputated limbs. Ann Vasc Surg 2025; 123: 454-465 / doi: 10.10 16/j.avsg.2025.10.005.

29. Martelli E, Zamboni M, Sotgiu G, et al. Sex-related differences and factors associated with peri-procedural and 1-year mortality in chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients from the CLIMATE registry. J Pers Med 2023; 13(2): 316 / doi: 10.3390/jpm13020316.

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-01