COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL INJURY MODELS FOR ASSESSING SYSTEMIC LACTATE RESPONSE

Authors

  • Alina BELU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Nina FILIP Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • B. I. TAMBA Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Oriana-Maria ONICESCU Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania
  • A. SZILAGYI Prof. Ostin C. Mungiu Advanced Research and Development Center for Experimental Medicine - CEMEX
  • Ivona MAZARIANU Prof. Ostin C. Mungiu Advanced Research and Development Center for Experimental Medicine - CEMEX
  • C. ROMAN Prof. Ostin C. Mungiu Advanced Research and Development Center for Experimental Medicine - CEMEX
  • Elena COJOCARU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/

Abstract

Experimental models of tissue injury may differ in their ability to obtain a measurable systemic metabolic response. The aim of our study was to compare systemic lactate dynamics across three trauma models-muscular, vascular, and bone trauma-and to assess their suitability for investigating circulating lactate as a marker of metabolic response. Materials and methods:  Male Wistar rats were allocated to three groups:  skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion, vascular trauma, and tibial bone injury (n = 11/group). Blood lactate was measured at three time points (T1-T3). Lactate peak, final concentration, clearance, and temporal slope were calculated and compared between models. Non-parametric statistical methods were applied because of deviations from normality. Results:  The three models generated distinct lactate trajectories. In the muscular trauma group, lactate changed from 2.19 ± 0.67 mmol/L at T1 to 1.44 ± 0.84 mmol/L at T2 and increased to 3.33 ± 1.15 mmol/L at T3 (Friedman χ² = 14.73, p < 0.001). This model showed negative lactate clearance (−59.0 ± 40.3%) and a positive temporal slope (+0.57 ± 0.46). Conversely, vascular and bone trauma resulted in lower final lactate concentrations (0.98 ± 0.56 and 1.14 ± 0.18 mmol/L), positive clearance (+22.8 ± 27.0% and +27.6 ± 12.5%), and negative temporal slopes. Conclusions:  Systemic lactate kinetics depend on injury type. Muscular trauma produced the most pronounced and sustained response, characterized by late lactate elevation and negative clearance, whereas vascular and bone trauma showed progressive lactate reduction. These findings support careful model selection when circulating lactate is used to investigate systemic metabolic responses to tissue injury. 

Author Biographies

  • B. I. TAMBA, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Prof. Ostin C. Mungiu Advanced Research and Development Center
    for Experimental Medicine - CEMEX

  • A. SZILAGYI, Prof. Ostin C. Mungiu Advanced Research and Development Center for Experimental Medicine - CEMEX

    Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania

References

1. Andersen LW, Mackenhauer J, Roberts JC, Berg KM, Cocchi MN, Donnino MW. Etiology and therapeutic approach to elevated lactate levels. Mayo Clin Proc 2013; 88(10): 1127-1140 / doi: 10.1016/ j.mayocp.2013.06.012.

2. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Lactic acidosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 371(24): 2309-2319 / doi: 10.1056/NEJ Mra1309483.

3. Brooks GA. The Science and Translation of Lactate Shuttle Theory. Cell Metab 2018; 27(4): 757-785 / doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.008.

4. Baxter J, Cranfield KR, Clark G, Harris T, Bloom B, Gray AJ. Do lactate levels in the emergency department predict outcome in adult trauma patients? A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 81(3): 555-566 / doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001156.

5. Lewis CT, Naumann DN, Crombie N, Midwinter MJ. Prehospital point-of-care lactate following trauma: A systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 81(4): 748-755. doi: 10.1097/TA.00 00000000001192.

6. Abramson D, Scalea TM, Hitchcock R, Trooskin SZ, Henry SM, Greenspan J. Lactate clearance and survival following injury. J Trauma 1993; 35(4): 584-588.

7. Odom SR, Howell MD, Silva GS, et al. Lactate clearance as a predictor of mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 74(4): 999-1004 / doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182858a3e.

8. Falter F, Tisherman SA, Perrino AC, et al. Serial Lactate in Clinical Medicine - A Narrative Review. J Intensive Care Med 2026; 41(3): 175-185 / doi: 10.1177/08850666241303460.

9. Blaisdell FW. The pathophysiology of skeletal muscle ischemia and the reperfusion syndrome: a review. Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 10(6): 620-630 / doi: 10.1177/09672109020 1000620.

10. Gallo de Carvalho E, Corsini W, de Almeida Hermes T. Severe muscle damage after a short period of ischemia and reperfusion in an animal model. Surgery 2023; 174(2): 363-368 / doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.033.

11. Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. J Physiol 2020; 598(18): 3793-3801 / doi: 10.11 13/JP280389.

12. Dezman ZDW, Comer AC, Smith GS, Narayan M, Scalea TM, Hirshon JM. Failure to clear elevated lactate predicts 24-hour mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 79(4): 580-585 / doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000810.

13. Deulkar P, Singam A, Mudiganti VNKS, Jain A. Lactate Monitoring in Intensive Care: A Compre-hensive Review of Its Utility and Interpretation. Cureus 2024; 16(8): e66356 / doi: 10.7759/cureus.66356.

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-28