VARIABILITY OF THE STREPTOZOTOCIN–NICOTINAMIDE MODEL OF EXPERIMENTAL DIABETES IN YOUNG SPRAGUE–DAWLEY RATS: A PRELIMINARY VALIDATION STUDY

Authors

  • C. G. TARTAU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • A. SZILAGYI Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Ivona COSTACHESCU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Leontina-Elena FILIPIUC Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • C. I. FOIA Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Adriana GRIGORAS Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Mioara TRANDAFIRESCU Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania
  • Cornelia AMALINEI Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22551/

Abstract

The streptozotocin–nicotinamide (STZ–NIA) model is widely used to induce experimental type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but its metabolic outcome may vary according to the induction protocol. This study evaluated the response to an initial and a modified STZ–NIA protocol in young Sprague–Dawley rats, with particular emphasis on blood glucose and body weight. Materials and methods: Rats were allocated to control and STZ–NIA groups. The initial protocol consisted of NIA pretreatment followed by STZ administration. As persistent hyperglycemia was not achieved, the protocol was modified by reducing NIA exposure and increasing the STZ dose. Blood glucose was measured longitudinally, and body weight was monitored throughout the experimental period. Parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses were performed. Results: The initial protocol did not induce persistent hyperglycemia. Following protocol modification, the STZ–NIA group showed significant temporal variation in blood glucose, with the most pronounced increase occurring after the second induction phase. However, this response was transient, with glucose levels subsequently returning toward baseline. Glycemia remained comparatively stable in control animals. Body weight increased in both groups throughout the study, with no significant difference in absolute or relative weight gain between groups. Conclusions: The modified STZ–NIA protocol produced a transient metabolic response but did not establish a stable diabetic phenotype. These findings are consistent with an important role of the balance between STZ-induced β-cell injury and NIA-mediated protection in determining the metabolic response. Longitudinal glucose monitoring and further optimization of the induction protocol, together with direct assessment of pancreatic β-cell integrity and insulin-related parameters, are warranted to establish a reproducible model for subsequent pharmacological studies. 

Author Biography

  • A. SZILAGYI, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania

    Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi

References

1. Młynarska E, Czarnik W, Dzieża N, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: new pathogenetic mechanisms, treatment and the most important complications. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26(3): 1094.

2. Dewalkar LP. Experimental models in diabetes research. Lab Anim Res 2026; 42: 25.

3. Lutz TA. Mammalian models of diabetes mellitus, with a focus on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2023; 19: 350-360.

4. Singh R, Gholipourmalekabadi M, Shafikhani SH. Animal models for type 1 and type 2 diabetes: advantages and limitations. Front Endocrinol 2024; 15: 1359685.

5. Pandey S, Chmelir T, Chottova Dvorakova M. Animal models in diabetic research - history, presence, and future perspectives. Biomedicines 2023; 11(10): 2852.

6. Ghasemi A, Jeddi S. Streptozotocin as a tool for induction of rat models of diabetes: a practical guide. EXCLI J 2023; 22: 274-294.

7. Brito AKdS, Mendes AVdS, Timah Acha B, et al. Experimental models of type 2 diabetes mellitus induced by combining hyperlipidemic diet (HFD) and streptozotocin administration in rats: an integrative review. Biomedicines 2025; 13(5): 1158.

8. Sedik AA, El-Mosallamy AEMK, Yassen NN, et al. Dose dependent toxicity of streptozotocin inducing diabetic complications in male Sprague Dawley rats with metabolic biochemical histopathological effects. Sci Rep 2025; 15: 43381.

9. Wang-Fischer Y, Garyantes T. Improving the reliability and utility of streptozotocin-induced rat diabetic model. J Diabetes Res 2018; 2018: 8054073.

10. Nahdi AMTA, John A, Raza H. Elucidation of molecular mechanisms of streptozotocin-induced oxidative stress, apoptosis, and mitochondrial dysfunction in Rin-5F pancreatic β-cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017; 2017: 7054272.

11. Furman BL. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic models in mice and rats. Curr Protoc 2021; 1(4): e78.

12. Yan LJ. The nicotinamide/streptozotocin rodent model of type 2 diabetes: renal pathophysiology and redox imbalance features. Biomolecules 2022; 12(9): 1225.

13. Cruz PL, Moraes-Silva IC, Ribeiro AA et al. Nicotinamide attenuates streptozotocin-induced diabetes complications and increases survival rate in rats: role of autonomic nervous system. BMC Endocr Disord 2021; 21(1): 133.

14. Mîndruț SG, Pop C, Mârza SM, et al. Comparative analysis of streptozotocin, streptozotocin–nicotinamide and alloxan-based diabetes models in female Wistar rats. Methods Protoc 2026; 9(3): 72.

15. Hurtado-Bagès S, Knobloch G, Ladurner AG, Buschbeck M. The taming of PARP1 and its impact on NAD+ metabolism. Mol Metab 2020; 38: 100950.

16. Szkudelski T. Streptozotocin-nicotinamide-induced diabetes in the rat. Characteristics of the experimental model. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2012; 237(5): 481-490.

17. Talbot SR, Heider M, Wirth M et al. Comparative analysis of dose-response variability and severity in STZ-induced diabetes: female vs. male NSG mice. Sci Rep 2026; 16: 8257.

18. Malicevic U, Smith J, Agrawal DK, Rai V. Sex-based differences in streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes rat models. J Clin Transl Res 2025; 11(6): 20-28.

19. Skovsø S. Modeling type 2 diabetes in rats using high fat diet and streptozotocin. J Diabetes Investig 2014; 5(4): 349-358.

20. Masiello P, Broca C, Gross R et al. Experimental NIDDM: development of a new model in adult rats administered streptozotocin and nicotinamide. Diabetes 1998; 47(2): 224-229.

21. Mahendra IPA, Udayani NNW, Sumerta IMA, Jayanti NMN, Widiastuti NKA, Sari NKRA. Dose-dependent outcomes of streptozotocin–nicotinamide induction in developing diabetic rat models: a literature review. IJPE (e-Journal) 2026; 6 (2): 338-357.

22. Rais N, Ved A, Ahmad R, et al. Model of streptozotocin-nicotinamide induced type 2 diabetes: a comparative review. Curr Diabetes Rev 2022; 18(8): e171121198001.

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-28