MEASLES: MANIFESTATIONS AT THE STAGE OF ELIMINATION OF INFECTION AND DIRECTIONS FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF THE EPIDEMIC PROCESS
Controlling measles is still important despite the significant progress achieved through routine immunization. Aim: to identify the weak points of the infection control system and to determine the directions for effective management of the epidemic process using the example of the local epidemic situation. Material and methods: The materials for the study were data from the official registration of the incidence of measles among residents of a large industrial city in 1988-2016 and the results of serological screening for anti-measles IgG of health care workers during the outbreak of measles in 2016. The epidemiological, clinical, serological and statistical research methods have been used. Results: In conditions of a high level of vaccination against measles in the metropolitan population, significant quantitative and qualitative changes occurred in the epidemic process of this infection. Between 2001 and 2015, on the territory of the city, local cases of measles were not recorded, and its single penetration from endemic territories did not cause the spread of the infection. However, in 2016, a measles outbreak was registered, due to the spread of infection mainly in medical settings among patients and staff. Serological immunity tests for measles conducted among health care workers showed that up to 80% of those who underwent the tests had a protective level of anti-measles antibodies, with the highest proportion of people with seroprotection being detected in the age group over 50 years old. Up to 40% of workers with an interval of 10 years and more after the last vaccination were included in the cohort of persons with anti-measles IgG below 0.18 IU / ml, i.е. below protective level. Conclusions: Measles remains an important infection, which has a possibility to spread among children and adults who are not protected against it. To effectively control the epidemic situation for measles during the elimination stage of the infection, it is necessary to implement a system of continuous monitoring of the intensity of measles immunity in the indicator groups and to perform routine immunization against measles once every 10 years up to 50 years of age. In the outbreaks where the first patient was not previously vaccinated, it is necessary to carry out booster immunization with live measles vaccine for contact people without preliminary screening.
2. Tsvirkun OV. The Epidemic Process of Measles at Different Times of its Vaccination. Synopsis of Thesis ... Dr. Med. Sciences. Moscow; 2012.
3. Romanenko VV. Vaccination of Communicable Diseases in the Child Health Management System of the Federal Subject of the Russian Federation: Thesis ... Dr. Med. Sciences. Yekaterinburg; 2012.
4. Selezneva TS, Zargariaants AI. The Situation of Measles Morbidity in the Russian Federation under Modern Conditions. Epidemiology and Vaccination 2009; 2: 8-15.
5. ***National Action Plan to implement the program "Elimination of Measles and Rubella in the Russian Federation" (2016-2020).
6. ***Program "Elimination of Measles and Rubella in the Russian Federation" (2016-2020).
7. Tsvirkun OV, Gerasimova AG, Tikhonova NT. The Characteristics of the Focality during the Elimi-nation of Measles. Epidemiology and Vaccination 2018; 5: 27-30.
8. Tsvirkun OV, Tikhonova NT, Yushchenko GV, Gerasimova AG. The Epidemic Process of Measles at Different Times of its Vaccination. Epidemiology and Vaccination 2015; 2: 80-87.
9. Werber D, Hoffmann A, Santibanez S, Mankertz A, Sagebiel D. Large measles outbreak introduced by asylum seekers and spread among the insufficiently vaccinated resident population, Berlin, October 2014 to August 2015. Eurosurveillance 2017; 22 (34): 1-8.
10. Choe YJ, Park Y-J. et al. An Outbreak of Measles in a University in Korea, 2014. J Korean Med Sci 2017; 32: 1876-1878.
11. L.M. Nic Lochlainn, Woudenberg T. et al. A novel measles outbreak control strategy in the Netherlands in 2013-2014 using a national electronic immunization register: A study of early MMR uptake and its determinants. Vaccine 2017; 35: 5828-5834.
12. Magurano F, Baggieri M. Towards measles elimination in Italy: Virological surveillance and genotypes trend (2013-2015). Virus Research 2017; 236: 24-29.
13. Gibney KB, Brahmi A, M. O’Hara, Morey R, Franklin L. Challenges in managing a school-based measles outbreak in Melbourne, Australia, 2014. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2017; 41: 80-84.
14. Tsvirkun OV, Gerasimova AG, Tikhonova NT, Turaeva NV, Pimenova AS. The Structure of the Measles Sufferers during the Elimination Period. Epidemiology and Vaccination 2012; 2: 21-25.
15. Kotlova VB, Kokoreva SP, Platonova AV. The measles yesterday and today. Electronic Science and Education Annals. Health and Education in the 21st Century. 2014; 16: 14-17.
Once an article is accepted for publication, MSJ requests a transfer of copyrights for published articles.
The copyright form will be signed by the corresponding author.
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORM FOR REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ A SOCIETĂȚII DE MEDICI ȘI NATURALIȘTI DIN IAȘI
THE MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF PHYSICIANS AND NATURALISTS FROM IASI
We, the undersigned authors of the manuscript entitled
this manuscript, which is submitted for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, has not been published and it is not under consideration for publication in another journal.
- we give the consent for publication in the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in printed and electronic format and we transfer unconditioned and complete the copyright of this manuscript to the REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALĂ, in the event of its acceptance.
- the manuscript does not break the intellectual property rights of any other person.
- we have read the submitted version of the manuscript and we are fully responsible for the content.
Names and signatures of authors / copyright owners (the following sequence is the authorship of the article):
N.B. All the authors must sign this form